Best Pingdom alternatives for 2026 (free and paid)

Max Rozen

Max Rozen

Last updated: November 04, 2026

Pingdom is one of the best-known website monitoring products. It has been around for years, is now part of SolarWinds, and remains a familiar choice for teams that want uptime monitoring, page speed monitoring, and transaction checks.

But it is not the only option. If you are comparing Pingdom alternatives in 2026, you are probably looking for one of three things: simpler pricing, faster uptime checks, or monitoring that covers more than public URLs.

This guide compares practical Pingdom alternatives for engineering teams, startups, agencies, and developers.

If you specifically want to compare OnlineOrNot and Pingdom side by side, read the Pingdom alternative comparison.

How this comparison was reviewed

This is a vendor-authored guide by OnlineOrNot, not an independent ranking or a hands-on benchmark. Recommendations reflect the workflows and published features each tool supports, not measured reliability or alert-delivery speed. On September 15, 2026, we checked the primary sources linked below for the plan and feature details discussed here, and checked OnlineOrNot's pricing and product implementation. Confirm current limits before purchasing; a feature being available does not mean it is included on the free or entry plan.

Table of contents

Quick comparison table

Tool Check frequency Free plan Browser checks Cron monitoring Status pages Best for
OnlineOrNot 30 seconds Pro; 3 minutes Hobby Yes Standalone Playwright scripts; not full project deployment Yes One public page on Pro; additional pages cost extra Software teams wanting uptime, browser checks, cron monitoring and status pages together
UptimeRobot 5 min Free / 60 sec Solo / 30 sec Team / 15 sec Scale; Enterprise custom options [1] Yes No Playwright script support listed [1] Included on paid plans [3] Yes Simple uptime checks and hobby projects
Better Stack Up to 30 seconds Yes Yes Heartbeats included Included Teams that want monitoring plus incident response
Uptime Kuma Configurable; capacity depends on your infrastructure Self-hosted v2.5.9 real-browser monitor loads a page; it is not an uploaded multi-step Playwright script Push monitors for heartbeats Self-hosted public status pages; their availability depends on your deployment Self-hosters and private infrastructure
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Variable Verify current synthetic-monitoring trial and allowances Yes Daily/weekly/monthly custom monitor schedules with job-result instrumentation Native Status Pages in the Incident Management/Incident Response product Enterprises already using Datadog
StatusCake 5min (Free), 1min (Superior), 30s (Business) Yes No (page speed only) Push monitors alert when a job stops sending its expected signal Yes Website monitoring plus page speed and domains
Uptime.com 1 minute minimum Trial Synthetic transaction checks use the Advanced Check allowance Heartbeat monitoring is an Advanced Check Status-page subscription is separately priced Larger teams with broad monitoring needs
Checkly Depends on monitor type and plan; verify required scheduling Yes Yes Heartbeats included Yes, separate product Code-first synthetic monitoring
Hyperping Plan-dependent Yes Yes, paid Heartbeats Yes Lightweight uptime monitoring and status pages

Intervals in the table describe scheduled uptime checks, not browser-run frequency or guaranteed time to an alert. Multi-region scheduling and failure confirmation are different: ask which locations run each check, how retries work, and how many failures trigger an alert.

Best overall Pingdom alternative: OnlineOrNot

OnlineOrNot is built for developers and small teams that want practical production monitoring without buying a full enterprise observability suite.

It covers the core workflows teams usually assemble across several tools: uptime checks, API monitoring, Playwright browser checks, cron job monitoring, alerts, and hosted status pages.

What it does well:

  • 30-second uptime checks - OnlineOrNot checks production services quickly enough for SaaS apps, APIs, and customer-facing workflows where several minutes of downtime matters.

  • Multi-location verification - Failures are verified from multiple regions before alerting, which helps reduce false positives caused by regional network issues.

  • Playwright browser checks - If your login, signup, checkout, or dashboard flow breaks while the homepage still returns 200 OK, browser checks can catch it.

  • Cron job monitoring - Backups, billing jobs, queue workers, and data pipelines can check in on a schedule. If they miss their window, OnlineOrNot alerts you.

  • Status pages included - Hosted status pages are included with paid plans, so you can communicate incidents without adding another vendor.

  • Team-friendly pricing - Pro starts at $25/month for 35 monitors, 3,000 browser runs per month, one public status page and unlimited team members. Additional monitors, browser runs and pages cost extra. See current pricing.

Where it falls short:

  • No APM or distributed tracing
  • No log aggregation
  • Not designed to replace Datadog, New Relic, or a full observability platform

Best for: SaaS teams, startups, agencies, and engineering teams that want uptime checks, browser checks, cron monitoring, and status pages in one lightweight product.

Best free starting point: UptimeRobot

UptimeRobot is a popular Pingdom alternative for teams that want simple uptime monitoring at a low starting cost.

It is especially common for personal projects, side projects, and small sites where the monitoring setup needs to be quick and inexpensive.

What it does well:

  • Generous free plan - Useful for personal projects and low-risk sites.
  • Fast setup - Add a URL, choose alert channels, and start monitoring.
  • Low-cost paid plans - A reasonable fit when you mostly need basic HTTP checks.
  • Familiar product - Many developers have used UptimeRobot before.

Where it falls short:

  • The free tier checks less frequently than many paid production setups need.
  • It is less focused on browser-based user journeys.
  • Paid plans already include heartbeat monitoring, status pages, and multi-location checks. Compare plan-specific seats, integrations, and subscriber features; scripted browser journeys remain a separate requirement.

Best for: Hobby projects, simple marketing sites, and teams that mainly need basic uptime checks.

If you are comparing OnlineOrNot directly with UptimeRobot, read the UptimeRobot alternative comparison.

Best for incident response: Better Stack

Better Stack combines uptime monitoring, incident management, on-call scheduling, logs, and status pages.

That makes it useful if your team wants more than “send an alert when a check fails.” Better Stack can help assign incidents, escalate alerts, and communicate with customers from the same broader platform.

What it does well:

  • Monitoring plus incident response - Good fit for teams that want on-call workflows with monitoring.
  • Status pages - Public incident communication is part of the product.
  • Logs and broader platform features - Useful if you want more than uptime monitoring.
  • Team workflows - Better fit for operational teams than simple personal monitoring tools.

Where it falls short:

  • More product than some teams need if they only want lightweight uptime monitoring.
  • Pricing can increase as you adopt more of the suite.
  • Teams that already use another incident-management workflow may not need the full platform.

Best for: Teams that want uptime monitoring and incident response in one place.

Best self-hosted option: Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is an open-source monitoring tool you run yourself.

It is popular because it has a friendly interface, supports many monitor types, and does not charge per monitor. The tradeoff is that you are responsible for keeping the monitoring system itself online.

What it does well:

  • Free and open source - No SaaS subscription.
  • Flexible monitor types - Supports HTTP, TCP, DNS, Docker containers, and more.
  • Good UI - More approachable than many self-hosted monitoring tools.
  • Private network support - Useful when you need monitoring inside your own infrastructure.

Where it falls short:

  • You maintain the server, backups, updates, and alert delivery.
  • Single-location monitoring is the default unless you design around it.
  • If the server running Uptime Kuma fails, your monitoring can fail with it.

Best for: Self-hosters, home labs, internal services, and teams comfortable maintaining their own monitoring stack.

Best enterprise option: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring is strongest when your company already uses Datadog for logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, and incident investigation.

For simple Pingdom replacement use cases, Datadog is usually more than you need. For larger teams that want synthetic checks connected to the rest of their observability data, it can be powerful.

What it does well:

  • Deep observability integration - Failed checks can connect to traces, logs, services, and infrastructure metrics.
  • API and browser tests - Useful for complex synthetic monitoring.
  • Enterprise controls - Good fit for larger organizations.
  • Global locations - Checks can run from many locations around the world.

Where it falls short:

  • Pricing can be hard to forecast for small teams.
  • It is not lightweight if all you need is uptime monitoring.
  • Public status pages are not the main product.

Best for: Enterprises already standardized on Datadog.

Other Pingdom alternatives to consider

StatusCake

StatusCake offers uptime monitoring, SSL monitoring, domain monitoring, page speed checks, and status pages.

It is a practical Pingdom alternative if you want a broader website monitoring suite and do not mind feature access changing by plan.

Best for: Teams that want uptime monitoring plus page speed, SSL, and domain checks.

Uptime.com

Uptime.com is a broader website monitoring platform with uptime checks, transaction checks, API monitoring, status pages, and reporting.

It is positioned more toward businesses with larger monitoring requirements than individual developers.

Best for: Larger teams that need multiple monitoring types and reporting.

Checkly

Checkly focuses on code-first synthetic monitoring. It is strongest when your team wants to write checks as code and integrate monitoring into development workflows.

Best for: Engineering teams that want programmable API and browser checks.

Hyperping

Hyperping is a lightweight uptime monitoring and status page product.

It is worth considering if you want a simple Pingdom alternative focused on uptime checks, incident communication, and a clean interface.

Best for: Small teams that want lightweight uptime monitoring and status pages.

How to choose a Pingdom alternative

The best Pingdom alternative depends on why you are leaving Pingdom.

1. If you need faster alerts

Look for 30-second or 1-minute checks on production plans. A 5-minute check interval may be fine for side projects, but it can be too slow for production SaaS apps and APIs.

2. If you get too many false positives

Prioritize multi-location verification. A single regional network issue should not wake up your on-call team if customers are not affected.

3. If public URLs are not enough

Choose a tool that supports browser checks, API checks, and cron job monitoring. Your homepage can be online while signup, billing, or a background job is broken.

4. If customers need outage updates

Choose a monitoring tool with built-in status pages or a clean status page integration. During incidents, communication matters as much as detection.

5. If your team is growing

Check how pricing changes with users, monitors, integrations, and status pages. A tool that is cheap for one person can become awkward for a team.

Compare the same workload during a trial

Pro starts at $25/month for 35 monitors, 3,000 browser runs per month, one public status page and unlimited team members. Additional monitors, browser runs and pages cost extra. See current pricing.

On a test endpoint you control, rehearse a failure and recovery. Check alert routing, confirmation delays, and recovery notifications before retiring the old monitors. This is a suggested evaluation, not a claim that we ran these tests against every vendor.

FAQ

What is the best Pingdom alternative?

For engineering teams that want uptime checks, browser checks, cron job monitoring, alerting, and status pages in one product, OnlineOrNot is a strong Pingdom alternative. UptimeRobot is a good free starting point, Better Stack is good for incident response, and Datadog is best for enterprises already using Datadog.

Is there a free Pingdom alternative?

Yes. UptimeRobot, Uptime Kuma, Better Stack, Hyperping, and OnlineOrNot all have free or low-cost ways to start, depending on whether you want hosted monitoring or self-hosted monitoring.

Why do teams switch away from Pingdom?

Reasons to compare alternatives include pricing, a different scripting workflow, cron job monitoring, or combining monitoring and incident communication. Pingdom already provides transaction monitoring for browser flows; needing browser checks alone is not a reason to switch.

Is UptimeRobot better than Pingdom?

UptimeRobot can be a better fit for simple uptime monitoring and low-cost monitoring. Pingdom can be a better fit for teams that already use SolarWinds products or want a mature website monitoring vendor. For teams that need browser checks and cron monitoring, OnlineOrNot may be a better fit than either.

Should I use a self-hosted Pingdom alternative?

Use a self-hosted tool like Uptime Kuma if you want control and are comfortable maintaining the monitoring server. Use a hosted tool if you want monitoring to remain independent from your own infrastructure.

Sources checked on September 15, 2026

Pingdom's public pricing could not be retrieved during this update, so this guide does not quote a current Pingdom entry price. Confirm its current plans and status-page offering directly.

The best Pingdom alternative depends on what you need next. If your team wants fast uptime checks, multi-location verification, browser checks, cron monitoring, and status pages without enterprise complexity, try OnlineOrNot.

How to choose

Written by OnlineOrNot. This is a comparison of published capabilities, not a reliability benchmark. Unverified claims are not treated as missing features. Documented examples, not hands-on benchmark results.

Choose UptimeRobot when

You want the free HTTP-monitor allowance, faster paid intervals or advance certificate-expiry reminders described in its current plans.

A public endpoint can be healthy while a job has stopped

Your application responds normally, but its scheduled invoice job never completes.

Use UptimeRobot’s heartbeat monitoring to detect the missing completion signal; uptime polling alone will not prove the job ran. Keep it when those checks and team features meet your needs, and add a script runner if you also need login and checkout validation.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Its faster paid intervals and advance certificate-expiry reminders are not replaced by OnlineOrNot Pro. Verify seats, currencies and plan limits.

Migration boundaries for UptimeRobot

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Better Stack when

You want monitoring connected to native on-call scheduling, incident response and separately priced telemetry products.

Free telemetry members are not free monitoring operators

Three engineers must manage monitors and incidents, but several colleagues only browse logs.

Better Stack’s free Member role is useful for telemetry access; monitoring operators consume responder licenses. Native on-call schedules and escalations are a reason to keep it. Telemetry bundles are separate and are not required merely to buy uptime monitoring.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Better Stack

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Uptime Kuma when

You want open-source monitoring on infrastructure you control and can operate, secure and back up yourself.

A browser page-load check is not a checkout script

Your self-hosted monitor needs to verify a page can open, but a separate requirement must sign in and submit a form.

Uptime Kuma v2.5.9 has a real-browser page-load monitor. That is a genuine browser capability, but not an uploaded multi-step Playwright journey. Operate it outside the same failure domain as the service it checks, and keep the distinction when comparing hosted script runners.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Uptime Kuma

  • Moving to a managed service changes infrastructure and network control. Check private-network access, data location, export format and operating responsibility before moving.

Choose Datadog when

Your team already uses Datadog and wants synthetic failures connected to infrastructure metrics, logs and traces.

Investigate a failed checkout beside its application trace

A synthetic checkout fails and the on-call engineer wants the failing service trace, logs and incident timeline in one platform.

Datadog provides that broader investigation workflow and native status pages. OnlineOrNot can run the standalone browser check, but it does not replace APM or native on-call scheduling. Compare the synthetic execution rates and active incident operators, not only the advertised API starting rate.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Datadog

  • Keep application errors, traces, infrastructure telemetry and associated investigations in this product if you still need them; OnlineOrNot does not replace them.

Choose StatusCake when

You want website monitoring alongside page-speed, domain and certificate monitoring.

A fast page load is not a successful checkout

Your landing page loads quickly, but the submit-order button fails after a JavaScript change.

StatusCake page-speed checks measure page loading, not the full login or checkout journey. Its push monitors can detect a missing backup, and its SSL checks include expiry alerts; those are genuine capabilities to preserve rather than reasons to claim they are missing.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for StatusCake

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Uptime.com when

You need Uptime.com monitoring and its supported transaction checks, reporting and integrations.

Budget for the page as well as the checks

A team buys endpoint and transaction checks, then wants customers to subscribe to a public incident page.

Uptime.com prices status pages as a separate module. Select the page subscription as well as the monitoring tier; the included Advanced Checks can cover the two browser journeys, but they are also shared with other advanced check types you create.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Uptime.com

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Checkly when

You need code-first synthetic monitoring, Playwright check suites, API multistep checks or plan-supported private locations.

Keep a test suite versus deploy a standalone script

Your existing Playwright project uses shared fixtures, imports and several related tests.

Checkly’s check suites fit that workflow. OnlineOrNot runs standalone Playwright scripts, so extract the required journey and validate it rather than assuming the full project imports unchanged. Price Communicate separately when the comparison includes a customer status page.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Detect, Communicate and Resolve are independently priced. Check seats, run quotas, overages and private-location requirements.
  • The synthetic-monitoring feature table lists 10-second frequency on Team and Enterprise. Do not confuse synthetic scheduling with HTTP uptime-check intervals.

Migration boundaries for Checkly

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Hyperping when

You want hosted uptime monitoring, browser checks, heartbeats and status pages.

Check included browser capacity before buying more runs

You need endpoint checks, a public page and a small number of browser checkout journeys, not a broad observability platform.

Hyperping combines those monitoring and communication features. Check the journey count, frequency and included run limits on the selected plan before assuming every provider needs usage add-ons; preserve any status-page audience features your customers use.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Hyperping

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose OnlineOrNot when

You want focused managed uptime, API checks, standalone Playwright scripts, heartbeats and hosted status pages without adopting a full observability platform.

A success page is not a completed checkout

Your storefront still responds with HTTP 200, but submitting an order no longer reaches the confirmation screen.

Use a standalone Playwright journey to sign in, submit a test order and assert the confirmation. An HTTP availability check alone does not exercise those steps. Keep native on-call scheduling or APM in a separate product if you need them.

Example documentation

Current limitations

  • Hobby is free and includes 3 uptime monitors at 3-minute intervals, 1,000 browser runs per month, 2 team members and 100 email status-page subscribers. SMS, webhooks and on-call integrations are not included on Hobby.
  • Pro HTTP checks support 30-second scheduling, not a guaranteed 30-second alert. Browser frequency, run duration and region count affect usage.
  • Alerts on invalid or expired certificates when SSL verification is enabled. No advance-expiry reminders
  • Standalone browser scripts do not replace a full Playwright project, arbitrary dependencies, private runners, application tracing or native on-call scheduling.
  • Enterprise reliability guarantees depend on your contract. No zero-false-positive or faster-than-competitors guarantee is offered.

Comparable workload costs

20 uptime monitors, three active operators and one public status page. Usage-priced HTTP estimates assume one request per monitor every minute for 30 days in one location: 864,000 HTTP executions. The browser workload adds two journeys every five minutes for 30 days in one region: 17,280 executions. More regions, retries, longer runs or retained products can add cost. HTTP intervals vary by plan; these are not equal-performance claims.

Monthly prices where published, before tax; currencies are not converted. Annual commitments, usage estimates, incomplete packages and subtotals are labelled. Browser totals include the base workload unless explicitly marked incomplete. Check current quotes before purchasing.

Monthly workload costs and package requirements
ProductUptime workloadWith browser journeys (total)
OnlineOrNot

USD $25/month

Pro $15 + one 25-monitor pack $10; unlimited users and public page included

USD $85/month

Pro $15 + one 25-monitor pack $10; unlimited users and public page included; 15 packs × $4 = $60

UptimeRobot

EUR €41/month

Team €41; 3 users and public page included

Does not cover this workload alone

Team €41; 3 users and public page included; no scripted browser-monitoring type in the reviewed catalog, so keep a separate browser tool.

Better Stack

USD $127/month

3 Responder × $34 + one 50-monitor pack $25; 3 users and public page included

USD About $184.60 at the unit rate/month

3 Responder × $34 + one 50-monitor pack $25; 3 users and public page included; If each execution averages 20 seconds: 5,760 minutes × $0.01

Uptime Kuma

Self-hosted; infrastructure and operations separate

Free open-source software, not a hosted subscription. Budget for an independently hosted server, backups, upgrades, alert transport and operator time; a server failure can take your monitor and status page offline together.

Self-hosted; infrastructure and operations separate

Free open-source software, not a hosted subscription. Budget for an independently hosted server, backups, upgrades, alert transport and operator time; a server failure can take your monitor and status page offline together.

Datadog

USD About $626.40 at the unit rate/month

3 Incident Management operator × $36 + 864,000 HTTP executions × $6 per 10,000; 3 users and public page included

USD About $885.60 at the unit rate/month

3 Incident Management operator × $36 + 864,000 HTTP executions × $6 per 10,000; 3 users and public page included; 17,280 billable browser executions × $15 per 1,000

StatusCake

EUR €113.94/month published subtotal, not a complete quote

Business €69.99 + Silver Pages, 50 services €43.95; 9 users and public page included Silver covers the 20 services, whereas Bronze covers only ten. The Pages pricing table does not state its administrator allowance: confirm all three operators can manage the page. Page speed monitoring is not a scripted login or checkout test.

EUR €113.94/month published subtotal, not a complete quote

Business €69.99 + Silver Pages, 50 services €43.95; 9 users and public page included; no scripted browser-monitoring type in the reviewed catalog, so keep a separate browser tool. Silver covers the 20 services, whereas Bronze covers only ten. The Pages pricing table does not state its administrator allowance: confirm all three operators can manage the page. Page speed monitoring is not a scripted login or checkout test.

Uptime.com

USD $32/month

25 basic / 3 advanced $19 + Status page with 250 subscribers $13; unlimited users and public page included

USD $32/month

25 basic / 3 advanced $19 + Status page with 250 subscribers $13; unlimited users and public page included; 2 of 25 basic / 3 advanced's 3 included browser checks, at a 5-minute interval

Checkly

USD $41/month

Starter Detect $29 + Starter Communicate $12; 3 users and public page included

USD $116/month

Starter Detect $29 + Starter Communicate $12; 3 users and public page included; 15 packs × $5 = $75

Hyperping

USD $29/month

Essentials $29; 3 users and public page included

USD $29/month

Essentials $29; 3 users and public page included; 2 of Essentials's 3 included browser checks, at a 5-minute interval

OnlineOrNot: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. One public page and unlimited Pro members are included; additional pages, private-page features, runs and monitor packs cost extra.

UptimeRobot: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly EUR, before tax. The configuration below includes three team members and one public status page; compare features, not just the entry headline.

Better Stack: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. The configuration below includes three team members and one public status page; compare features, not just the entry headline.
  • Browser estimate assumes 20 seconds per execution at the published minute rate, not a fixed quote. Telemetry products are separately priced.
  • All three active operators need responder licenses: free Member roles cannot access monitors, incidents or status pages. The selected subtotal does not require a telemetry bundle.

Uptime Kuma: pricing assumptions

  • No universal hosted total exists. Price a separate failure domain for the monitor, backups, upgrades and notification transport; additional scripted-browser infrastructure is separate.

Datadog: pricing assumptions

  • Usage estimate at US month-to-month rates, not discounted annual or higher on-demand rates: single-request HTTP tests once a minute, one location, one browser/device configuration and three active Incident Management operators. Native public Status Pages are included in that product; additional telemetry, retries and billable execution rules can change the invoice.

StatusCake: pricing assumptions

  • The subtotal combines Business monitoring and Silver Pages so the page can represent all monitored services. Silver’s page administrator allowance is not published, so confirm access for three operators before treating this as a complete quote. A scripted browser runner would cost extra.

Uptime.com: pricing assumptions

  • The monitoring tier and the separate public-page module are both included in the total. Advanced Checks share their allowance with API, transaction and heartbeat monitoring. No RUM add-on is assumed.

Checkly: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. The configuration below includes three team members and one public status page; compare features, not just the entry headline.

Hyperping: pricing assumptions

  • The current first-party page states that all prices are USD. Monthly and annual equivalents differ; the quote uses monthly Essentials pricing and the stated included monitoring allowance.

Migration boundaries

  • Recreate supported checks, credentials, regions, assertions and alert routing. Test a controlled failure and recovery in parallel before cancelling your current service.
  • Historical incidents, response-time data, SLA reports, integrations, status-page domains and subscriber lists do not automatically transfer. Export an archive and plan each cutover.
  • Keep unsupported capabilities in the existing product. Agree assisted-migration scope and timing; do not send secrets by email.

Sources and review status

OnlineOrNot — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The new-customer Pro package includes 35 monitors; larger monitor and browser allowances use add-ons.

    35 monitors

    https://onlineornot.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

UptimeRobot — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Better Stack — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Uptime Kuma — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Datadog — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

StatusCake — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Uptime.com — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The reviewed calculator prices website monitoring and status pages separately.

    Status Pages

    https://uptime.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

  • Advanced Checks include synthetic transactions and heartbeats.

    Heartbeat (Cron) Monitoring

    https://uptime.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

Checkly — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The package combines Detect and Communicate; additional browser runs use purchased packs rather than the higher overage rate.

    Purchase additional browser check runs in blocks of 1,000.

    https://www.checklyhq.com/pricing.md

    Observed 2026-11-04

  • Checkly includes heartbeat checks and supports Playwright suites.

    URL (HTTP/HTTPS), TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL, gRPC, Traceroute, and Heartbeat

    https://www.checklyhq.com/pricing.md

    Observed 2026-11-04

Hyperping — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Help us correct this comparison

We welcome corrections from readers and competitors. Email max@onlineornot.com with the page, claim and a primary source. A person reviews corrections before publication.

Reliable uptime monitoring
for your team in <5 mins.
Get started for free

No credit card required.