Best UptimeRobot alternatives for 2026 (free and paid)

Max Rozen

Max Rozen

Last updated: November 04, 2026

UptimeRobot is one of the most popular uptime monitoring tools because it is simple, recognizable, and easy to start with.

UptimeRobot now covers multi-location, API, and heartbeat monitoring on paid plans. Teams still compare alternatives when they need Playwright scripts, different check-interval packaging, more team access, or a different incident workflow.

This guide compares the UptimeRobot alternatives worth considering in 2026.

If you specifically want to compare OnlineOrNot and UptimeRobot side by side, read the UptimeRobot alternative comparison.

UptimeRobot details were rechecked on September 15, 2026 against its public pricing and feature table, multi-location documentation, and heartbeat monitoring documentation. Plans can change, so verify current limits before purchasing.

How this comparison was reviewed

This is a vendor-authored guide by OnlineOrNot, not an independent ranking or a hands-on benchmark. Recommendations reflect the workflows and published features each tool supports, not measured reliability or alert-delivery speed. On September 15, 2026, we checked the primary sources linked below for the plan and feature details discussed here, and checked OnlineOrNot's pricing and product implementation. Confirm current limits before purchasing; a feature being available does not mean it is included on the free or entry plan.

Table of contents

Quick comparison table

Tool Check frequency Free plan Browser checks Cron monitoring Status pages Best for
OnlineOrNot 30 seconds Pro; 3 minutes Hobby Yes Standalone Playwright scripts; not full project deployment Yes One public page on Pro; additional pages cost extra Software teams wanting uptime, browser checks, cron monitoring and status pages together
Better Stack Up to 30 seconds Yes Yes Heartbeats included Included Teams that want monitoring plus incident response
Uptime Kuma Configurable; capacity depends on your infrastructure Self-hosted v2.5.9 real-browser monitor loads a page; it is not an uploaded multi-step Playwright script Push monitors for heartbeats Self-hosted public status pages; their availability depends on your deployment Self-hosters and private infrastructure
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring Variable Verify current synthetic-monitoring trial and allowances Yes Daily/weekly/monthly custom monitor schedules with job-result instrumentation Native Status Pages in the Incident Management/Incident Response product Enterprises already using Datadog
Pingdom Uptime from 1 minute; transactions from 5 minutes No Transaction checks with recorder/editor; region and interval configured per check Reviewed catalog covers uptime, page speed and transactions; retain a heartbeat service for missed-job detection Public status pages and reports included Teams that want a mature SolarWinds monitoring product
StatusCake 5min (Free), 1min (Superior), 30s (Business) Yes No (page speed only) Push monitors alert when a job stops sending its expected signal Yes Website monitoring plus page speed and domains
Uptime.com 1 minute minimum Trial Synthetic transaction checks use the Advanced Check allowance Heartbeat monitoring is an Advanced Check Status-page subscription is separately priced Larger teams with broad monitoring needs
Hyperping Plan-dependent Yes Yes, paid Heartbeats Yes Lightweight uptime monitoring and status pages
Checkly Depends on monitor type and plan; verify required scheduling Yes Yes Heartbeats included Yes, separate product Code-first synthetic monitoring

Intervals in the table describe scheduled uptime checks, not browser-run frequency or guaranteed time to an alert. Multi-region scheduling and failure confirmation are different: ask which locations run each check, how retries work, and how many failures trigger an alert.

Best overall UptimeRobot alternative: OnlineOrNot

OnlineOrNot is built for developers and small teams that need production monitoring without a heavy enterprise observability stack.

It covers uptime checks, API monitoring, Playwright browser checks, cron job monitoring, alerts, and hosted status pages in one product.

What it does well:

  • 30-second uptime checks - Faster checks are useful when downtime affects revenue, customer trust, or support volume.

  • Multi-location verification - OnlineOrNot verifies failures from multiple regions before alerting, which helps reduce false positives from regional network problems.

  • Playwright browser checks - Uptime monitoring can tell you a URL responds. Browser checks can tell you whether login, signup, checkout, or a dashboard flow still works.

  • Cron job monitoring - Scheduled jobs, queue workers, backups, billing jobs, and data pipelines can check in on a schedule. If a job misses its window, OnlineOrNot alerts you.

  • Status pages included - Hosted status pages help communicate incidents without adding a separate status page vendor.

  • Unlimited team members on paid plans - Helpful when monitoring is owned by a team, not one person.

Where it falls short:

  • No log aggregation
  • No APM or distributed tracing
  • Not designed to replace a full observability platform

Best for: SaaS companies, agencies, startups, and production teams that have outgrown basic uptime checks.

Best for incident response: Better Stack

Better Stack combines uptime monitoring with incident management, on-call scheduling, logs, and status pages.

It is a strong UptimeRobot alternative if your team wants alerting and incident response in the same product.

What it does well:

  • 30-second checks - Fast enough for most production websites and APIs.
  • Incident response workflows - On-call scheduling, escalation, and incident timelines are built in.
  • Status pages - Public communication is part of the platform.
  • Broader suite - Useful if logs and incident workflows are part of the buying decision.

Where it falls short:

  • More product than some small teams need.
  • Pricing can increase as you adopt more of the suite.
  • If you already have incident management elsewhere, the overlap may be unnecessary.

Best for: Teams that want monitoring and incident response together.

Best self-hosted option: Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma is an open-source uptime monitoring tool you run yourself.

It is one of the most common UptimeRobot alternatives for self-hosters because it has a friendly UI and supports many monitor types.

What it does well:

  • Free and open source - No SaaS subscription.
  • Flexible monitor types - HTTP, TCP, DNS, Docker containers, and more.
  • Good UI - Approachable for self-hosted monitoring.
  • Private infrastructure - Useful when checks need to run inside your network.

Where it falls short:

  • You maintain updates, backups, hosting, and alert delivery.
  • Monitoring can fail with your infrastructure if you host it in the same environment.
  • Multi-region monitoring requires extra work.

Best for: Self-hosters, home labs, private services, and teams comfortable maintaining their own monitoring infrastructure.

Best for enterprise monitoring: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring

Datadog Synthetic Monitoring is a good fit for organizations already using Datadog for metrics, logs, traces, and dashboards.

It is usually too much if you only need simple uptime monitoring, but it is powerful when synthetic checks need to connect to the rest of your observability stack.

What it does well:

  • Deep observability integration - Failed checks can connect to traces, logs, services, and infrastructure data.
  • API and browser tests - Useful for complex synthetic monitoring.
  • Enterprise controls - Better suited to large organizations than lightweight uptime-only products.
  • Global test locations - Checks can run from many locations.

Where it falls short:

  • Pricing can be hard to forecast.
  • It is not lightweight for teams that only need uptime alerts.
  • Public status pages are not the core product.

Best for: Enterprises already standardized on Datadog.

Best Pingdom-style enterprise option: Pingdom

Pingdom is a long-running website monitoring product from SolarWinds.

It offers uptime monitoring, page speed monitoring, transaction monitoring, and alerting. If your team wants to move from UptimeRobot to a more established website monitoring vendor, Pingdom is one option to consider.

What it does well:

  • Mature product - Pingdom has been in the category for a long time.
  • Website monitoring focus - Uptime, page speed, and transaction monitoring are core use cases.
  • Recognizable vendor - Useful for teams that prefer established vendors.

Where it falls short:

  • It may be more product and vendor complexity than smaller teams want.
  • Cron job monitoring and modern developer workflows may require another tool.
  • Pricing and plan details should be checked carefully against current public pricing.

Best for: Teams that want a mature SolarWinds website monitoring product.

If you are comparing OnlineOrNot directly with Pingdom, read the Pingdom alternative comparison.

Other UptimeRobot alternatives to consider

StatusCake

StatusCake offers uptime monitoring, SSL monitoring, domain monitoring, page speed checks, and status pages.

It is a practical alternative if you want a broader website monitoring suite and do not mind plan-based feature access.

Best for: Teams that want uptime monitoring plus SSL, domain, and page speed checks.

Uptime.com

Uptime.com is a broader monitoring platform with uptime checks, transaction checks, API monitoring, status pages, and reporting.

It is positioned more toward businesses with larger monitoring needs than individual developers.

Best for: Larger teams that need multiple monitoring types and reporting.

Hyperping

Hyperping is a lightweight uptime monitoring and status page product.

It is worth considering if you want a simple hosted alternative focused on uptime checks and customer communication.

Best for: Small teams that want lightweight uptime monitoring and status pages.

Checkly

Checkly focuses on code-first synthetic monitoring.

It is strongest when your team wants checks defined in code and integrated into engineering workflows.

Best for: Engineering teams that want programmable API and browser monitoring.

How to choose an UptimeRobot alternative

The best UptimeRobot alternative depends on what made you start looking.

1. If check frequency is the issue

UptimeRobot already offers 60-second Solo, 30-second Team, and 15-second Scale checks. OnlineOrNot Pro checks every 30 seconds, so it is not a faster replacement for Scale. Compare the monitor allowance and full bill at your required interval before switching.

2. If false positives are the issue

Look for multi-region verification. A single monitoring location can create noisy alerts when the problem is regional routing rather than a real outage.

3. If basic uptime checks are not enough

Pick a tool that supports browser checks, API checks, content assertions, and cron job monitoring. A service can respond with 200 OK while the customer experience is broken.

4. If incident communication matters

Choose a tool with hosted status pages or a clean status page integration. During outages, customers want to know whether you know about the problem.

5. If your team is growing

Check how pricing changes with users, monitors, alert channels, status pages, and synthetic checks. Team pricing matters once monitoring is no longer owned by one person.

Compare the same workload during a trial

Pro starts at $25/month for 35 monitors, 3,000 browser runs per month, one public status page and unlimited team members. Additional monitors, browser runs and pages cost extra. See current pricing.

On a test endpoint you control, rehearse a failure and recovery. Check alert routing, confirmation delays, and recovery notifications before retiring the old monitors. This is a suggested evaluation, not a claim that we ran these tests against every vendor.

FAQ

What is the best UptimeRobot alternative?

For engineering teams that need uptime checks, browser checks, cron monitoring, status pages, and multi-location verification, OnlineOrNot is a strong UptimeRobot alternative. Better Stack is strong for incident response, Uptime Kuma is strong for self-hosting, and Datadog is best for enterprises already using Datadog.

Is there a free UptimeRobot alternative?

Yes. OnlineOrNot, Better Stack, Hyperping, and StatusCake have free or low-cost ways to start. Uptime Kuma is free and open source if you are comfortable hosting it yourself.

Why do teams switch away from UptimeRobot?

Common reasons include needing Playwright scripts, different monitor allowances for 30-second checks, different team-seat pricing, more flexible alerting, or a different incident workflow. UptimeRobot already offers paid multi-location and heartbeat monitoring, so those features alone are not reasons to switch.

Is Uptime Kuma better than UptimeRobot?

Uptime Kuma can be better if you want self-hosted monitoring and control over your infrastructure. UptimeRobot is easier if you want hosted monitoring without maintaining a server. For production teams that want hosted monitoring plus browser checks and cron monitoring, OnlineOrNot is usually a better fit than self-hosting.

Is Pingdom better than UptimeRobot?

Pingdom can be a better fit for teams that want a mature website monitoring product from SolarWinds. UptimeRobot can be a better fit for a large free monitor allowance or its current paid feature set. OnlineOrNot is a better fit when the comparison is about Playwright scripts, 30-second Pro checks, and unlimited team access.

Sources checked on September 15, 2026

Pingdom's public pricing could not be retrieved during this update, so this guide does not quote a current Pingdom entry price. Confirm its current plans and status-page offering directly.

UptimeRobot has grown beyond basic uptime checks. If you want Playwright scripts, 30-second Pro checks, cron monitoring, status pages, and unlimited team members in one product, try OnlineOrNot.

How to choose

Written by OnlineOrNot. This is a comparison of published capabilities, not a reliability benchmark. Unverified claims are not treated as missing features. Documented examples, not hands-on benchmark results.

Choose Better Stack when

You want monitoring connected to native on-call scheduling, incident response and separately priced telemetry products.

Free telemetry members are not free monitoring operators

Three engineers must manage monitors and incidents, but several colleagues only browse logs.

Better Stack’s free Member role is useful for telemetry access; monitoring operators consume responder licenses. Native on-call schedules and escalations are a reason to keep it. Telemetry bundles are separate and are not required merely to buy uptime monitoring.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Better Stack

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Uptime Kuma when

You want open-source monitoring on infrastructure you control and can operate, secure and back up yourself.

A browser page-load check is not a checkout script

Your self-hosted monitor needs to verify a page can open, but a separate requirement must sign in and submit a form.

Uptime Kuma v2.5.9 has a real-browser page-load monitor. That is a genuine browser capability, but not an uploaded multi-step Playwright journey. Operate it outside the same failure domain as the service it checks, and keep the distinction when comparing hosted script runners.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Uptime Kuma

  • Moving to a managed service changes infrastructure and network control. Check private-network access, data location, export format and operating responsibility before moving.

Choose Datadog when

Your team already uses Datadog and wants synthetic failures connected to infrastructure metrics, logs and traces.

Investigate a failed checkout beside its application trace

A synthetic checkout fails and the on-call engineer wants the failing service trace, logs and incident timeline in one platform.

Datadog provides that broader investigation workflow and native status pages. OnlineOrNot can run the standalone browser check, but it does not replace APM or native on-call scheduling. Compare the synthetic execution rates and active incident operators, not only the advertised API starting rate.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Datadog

  • Keep application errors, traces, infrastructure telemetry and associated investigations in this product if you still need them; OnlineOrNot does not replace them.

Choose Pingdom when

You want Pingdom uptime and transaction monitoring within an existing SolarWinds workflow.

Recorded checkout versus an existing Playwright file

A QA team wants to record adding a product to a cart and confirm the final URL without maintaining a test project.

Pingdom provides its transaction recorder and check editor. If your existing Playwright file imports fixtures or project configuration, neither Pingdom recording commands nor OnlineOrNot standalone scripts are a drop-in import; rebuild and validate the journey.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Pingdom

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose StatusCake when

You want website monitoring alongside page-speed, domain and certificate monitoring.

A fast page load is not a successful checkout

Your landing page loads quickly, but the submit-order button fails after a JavaScript change.

StatusCake page-speed checks measure page loading, not the full login or checkout journey. Its push monitors can detect a missing backup, and its SSL checks include expiry alerts; those are genuine capabilities to preserve rather than reasons to claim they are missing.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for StatusCake

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Uptime.com when

You need Uptime.com monitoring and its supported transaction checks, reporting and integrations.

Budget for the page as well as the checks

A team buys endpoint and transaction checks, then wants customers to subscribe to a public incident page.

Uptime.com prices status pages as a separate module. Select the page subscription as well as the monitoring tier; the included Advanced Checks can cover the two browser journeys, but they are also shared with other advanced check types you create.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Uptime.com

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Hyperping when

You want hosted uptime monitoring, browser checks, heartbeats and status pages.

Check included browser capacity before buying more runs

You need endpoint checks, a public page and a small number of browser checkout journeys, not a broad observability platform.

Hyperping combines those monitoring and communication features. Check the journey count, frequency and included run limits on the selected plan before assuming every provider needs usage add-ons; preserve any status-page audience features your customers use.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Confirm current plan allowances, intervals, regions, team access, alert destinations and status-page requirements at the source before buying.

Migration boundaries for Hyperping

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose Checkly when

You need code-first synthetic monitoring, Playwright check suites, API multistep checks or plan-supported private locations.

Keep a test suite versus deploy a standalone script

Your existing Playwright project uses shared fixtures, imports and several related tests.

Checkly’s check suites fit that workflow. OnlineOrNot runs standalone Playwright scripts, so extract the required journey and validate it rather than assuming the full project imports unchanged. Price Communicate separately when the comparison includes a customer status page.

Example documentation

Limitations and requirements to check

  • Detect, Communicate and Resolve are independently priced. Check seats, run quotas, overages and private-location requirements.
  • The synthetic-monitoring feature table lists 10-second frequency on Team and Enterprise. Do not confuse synthetic scheduling with HTTP uptime-check intervals.

Migration boundaries for Checkly

  • Recreate supported endpoints and notifications, and validate failure and recovery in parallel. Keep any product-specific features OnlineOrNot does not replace.

Choose OnlineOrNot when

You want focused managed uptime, API checks, standalone Playwright scripts, heartbeats and hosted status pages without adopting a full observability platform.

A success page is not a completed checkout

Your storefront still responds with HTTP 200, but submitting an order no longer reaches the confirmation screen.

Use a standalone Playwright journey to sign in, submit a test order and assert the confirmation. An HTTP availability check alone does not exercise those steps. Keep native on-call scheduling or APM in a separate product if you need them.

Example documentation

Current limitations

  • Hobby is free and includes 3 uptime monitors at 3-minute intervals, 1,000 browser runs per month, 2 team members and 100 email status-page subscribers. SMS, webhooks and on-call integrations are not included on Hobby.
  • Pro HTTP checks support 30-second scheduling, not a guaranteed 30-second alert. Browser frequency, run duration and region count affect usage.
  • Alerts on invalid or expired certificates when SSL verification is enabled. No advance-expiry reminders
  • Standalone browser scripts do not replace a full Playwright project, arbitrary dependencies, private runners, application tracing or native on-call scheduling.
  • Enterprise reliability guarantees depend on your contract. No zero-false-positive or faster-than-competitors guarantee is offered.

Comparable workload costs

20 uptime monitors, three active operators and one public status page. Usage-priced HTTP estimates assume one request per monitor every minute for 30 days in one location: 864,000 HTTP executions. The browser workload adds two journeys every five minutes for 30 days in one region: 17,280 executions. More regions, retries, longer runs or retained products can add cost. HTTP intervals vary by plan; these are not equal-performance claims.

Monthly prices where published, before tax; currencies are not converted. Annual commitments, usage estimates, incomplete packages and subtotals are labelled. Browser totals include the base workload unless explicitly marked incomplete. Check current quotes before purchasing.

Monthly workload costs and package requirements
ProductUptime workloadWith browser journeys (total)
OnlineOrNot

USD $25/month

Pro $15 + one 25-monitor pack $10; unlimited users and public page included

USD $85/month

Pro $15 + one 25-monitor pack $10; unlimited users and public page included; 15 packs × $4 = $60

Better Stack

USD $127/month

3 Responder × $34 + one 50-monitor pack $25; 3 users and public page included

USD About $184.60 at the unit rate/month

3 Responder × $34 + one 50-monitor pack $25; 3 users and public page included; If each execution averages 20 seconds: 5,760 minutes × $0.01

Uptime Kuma

Self-hosted; infrastructure and operations separate

Free open-source software, not a hosted subscription. Budget for an independently hosted server, backups, upgrades, alert transport and operator time; a server failure can take your monitor and status page offline together.

Self-hosted; infrastructure and operations separate

Free open-source software, not a hosted subscription. Budget for an independently hosted server, backups, upgrades, alert transport and operator time; a server failure can take your monitor and status page offline together.

Datadog

USD About $626.40 at the unit rate/month

3 Incident Management operator × $36 + 864,000 HTTP executions × $6 per 10,000; 3 users and public page included

USD About $885.60 at the unit rate/month

3 Incident Management operator × $36 + 864,000 HTTP executions × $6 per 10,000; 3 users and public page included; 17,280 billable browser executions × $15 per 1,000

Pingdom

EUR €33/month

25 uptime / 4 advanced €33; unlimited users and public page included

EUR €33/month

25 uptime / 4 advanced €33; unlimited users and public page included; 2 of 25 uptime / 4 advanced's 4 included browser checks, at a 5-minute interval

StatusCake

EUR €113.94/month published subtotal, not a complete quote

Business €69.99 + Silver Pages, 50 services €43.95; 9 users and public page included Silver covers the 20 services, whereas Bronze covers only ten. The Pages pricing table does not state its administrator allowance: confirm all three operators can manage the page. Page speed monitoring is not a scripted login or checkout test.

EUR €113.94/month published subtotal, not a complete quote

Business €69.99 + Silver Pages, 50 services €43.95; 9 users and public page included; no scripted browser-monitoring type in the reviewed catalog, so keep a separate browser tool. Silver covers the 20 services, whereas Bronze covers only ten. The Pages pricing table does not state its administrator allowance: confirm all three operators can manage the page. Page speed monitoring is not a scripted login or checkout test.

Uptime.com

USD $32/month

25 basic / 3 advanced $19 + Status page with 250 subscribers $13; unlimited users and public page included

USD $32/month

25 basic / 3 advanced $19 + Status page with 250 subscribers $13; unlimited users and public page included; 2 of 25 basic / 3 advanced's 3 included browser checks, at a 5-minute interval

Hyperping

USD $29/month

Essentials $29; 3 users and public page included

USD $29/month

Essentials $29; 3 users and public page included; 2 of Essentials's 3 included browser checks, at a 5-minute interval

Checkly

USD $41/month

Starter Detect $29 + Starter Communicate $12; 3 users and public page included

USD $116/month

Starter Detect $29 + Starter Communicate $12; 3 users and public page included; 15 packs × $5 = $75

OnlineOrNot: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. One public page and unlimited Pro members are included; additional pages, private-page features, runs and monitor packs cost extra.

Better Stack: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. The configuration below includes three team members and one public status page; compare features, not just the entry headline.
  • Browser estimate assumes 20 seconds per execution at the published minute rate, not a fixed quote. Telemetry products are separately priced.
  • All three active operators need responder licenses: free Member roles cannot access monitors, incidents or status pages. The selected subtotal does not require a telemetry bundle.

Uptime Kuma: pricing assumptions

  • No universal hosted total exists. Price a separate failure domain for the monitor, backups, upgrades and notification transport; additional scripted-browser infrastructure is separate.

Datadog: pricing assumptions

  • Usage estimate at US month-to-month rates, not discounted annual or higher on-demand rates: single-request HTTP tests once a minute, one location, one browser/device configuration and three active Incident Management operators. Native public Status Pages are included in that product; additional telemetry, retries and billable execution rules can change the invoice.

Pingdom: pricing assumptions

  • The observed calculator presents EUR. These are monthly tier prices, not annual equivalents; no RUM subscription is needed for the stated workload. Advanced checks are shared by transactions and page-speed monitors.

StatusCake: pricing assumptions

  • The subtotal combines Business monitoring and Silver Pages so the page can represent all monitored services. Silver’s page administrator allowance is not published, so confirm access for three operators before treating this as a complete quote. A scripted browser runner would cost extra.

Uptime.com: pricing assumptions

  • The monitoring tier and the separate public-page module are both included in the total. Advanced Checks share their allowance with API, transaction and heartbeat monitoring. No RUM add-on is assumed.

Hyperping: pricing assumptions

  • The current first-party page states that all prices are USD. Monthly and annual equivalents differ; the quote uses monthly Essentials pricing and the stated included monitoring allowance.

Checkly: pricing assumptions

  • Monthly USD, before tax. The configuration below includes three team members and one public status page; compare features, not just the entry headline.

Migration boundaries

  • Recreate supported checks, credentials, regions, assertions and alert routing. Test a controlled failure and recovery in parallel before cancelling your current service.
  • Historical incidents, response-time data, SLA reports, integrations, status-page domains and subscriber lists do not automatically transfer. Export an archive and plan each cutover.
  • Keep unsupported capabilities in the existing product. Agree assisted-migration scope and timing; do not send secrets by email.

Sources and review status

OnlineOrNot — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The new-customer Pro package includes 35 monitors; larger monitor and browser allowances use add-ons.

    35 monitors

    https://onlineornot.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

Better Stack — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Uptime Kuma — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Datadog — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Pingdom — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

StatusCake — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Uptime.com — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The reviewed calculator prices website monitoring and status pages separately.

    Status Pages

    https://uptime.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

  • Advanced Checks include synthetic transactions and heartbeats.

    Heartbeat (Cron) Monitoring

    https://uptime.com/pricing

    Observed 2026-11-04

Hyperping — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

Checkly — selected facts checked 2026-11-04

Reviewed evidence

  • The package combines Detect and Communicate; additional browser runs use purchased packs rather than the higher overage rate.

    Purchase additional browser check runs in blocks of 1,000.

    https://www.checklyhq.com/pricing.md

    Observed 2026-11-04

  • Checkly includes heartbeat checks and supports Playwright suites.

    URL (HTTP/HTTPS), TCP, DNS, ICMP, SSL, gRPC, Traceroute, and Heartbeat

    https://www.checklyhq.com/pricing.md

    Observed 2026-11-04

Help us correct this comparison

We welcome corrections from readers and competitors. Email max@onlineornot.com with the page, claim and a primary source. A person reviews corrections before publication.

Reliable uptime monitoring
for your team in <5 mins.
Get started for free

No credit card required.